persmedРоссийский журнал персонализированной медициныRussian Journal for Personalized Medicine2782-38062782-3814ФОНД АЛМАЗОВА10.18705/2782-3806-2024-4-1-19-24ZJJHSSpersmed-233Research ArticleЛУЧЕВАЯ ДИАГНОСТИКАDIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGYМетодика 4D FLOW в оценке кровотока в аорте.4D FLOW in assessing blood flow in aorta.ШериевС. Р.SherievS. R.

Шериев Султан Русланович, ординатор кафедры лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации с клиникой ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России

ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург; 197341

Sheriev Sultan R., resident of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and medical imaging with the clinic Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341

sapiensowl@gmail.comТурчинскаяИ. А.TurchinskayaI. A.

Турчинская Ирина Анатольевна, ординатор кафедры лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации с клиникой ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России

ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург; 197341

Turchinskaya Irina A., resident of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and medical imaging with the clinic Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341

ФокинВ. А.FokinV. A.

Фокин Владимир Александрович, д.м.н., профессор кафедры лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации с клиникой ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России

ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург; 197341

Fokin Vladimir A., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Radiation diagnostics and medical imaging with the clinic Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341

РыжковА. В.RyzhkovA. V.

Рыжков Антон Владимирович, заведующий отделением магнитно-резонансной томографии, врач-рентгенолог высшей категории ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России

ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург; 197341

Ryzhkov Anton V., Head of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Department, radiologist of the highest category, Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341

Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр имени В. А. Алмазова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской ФедерацииРоссияAlmazov National Medical Research CentreRussian Federation202422032024411924Copyright © Шериев С.Р., Турчинская И.А., Фокин В.А., Рыжков А.В., 20242024Шериев С.Р., Турчинская И.А., Фокин В.А., Рыжков А.В.Sheriev S.R., Turchinskaya I.A., Fokin V.A., Ryzhkov A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://persmed.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/233

Статья посвящена обзору роли методики 4D FLOW в оценке кровотока восходящего отдела аорты. Приводится краткий историко-терминологический очерк, а также описание состояния проблемы на данный момент. Обсуждаются вопросы клинической важности и целесообразности использования данного метода лучевой диагностики. Обобщается процесс сканирования и постпроцессинга изображений. В заключение обобщены перспективы и значимость рассмотренной методики в структуре здравоохранения.

The article is dedicated to reviewing the role of the 4D FLOW technique in assessing blood flow in the aorta. A brief historical and terminological overview is provided, along with a description of the current state of the issue. The clinical relevance and appropriateness of using this radiological diagnostic method are discussed. The scanning and image post-processing process is summarized. Finally, the prospects and significance of the reviewed technique in healthcare are outlined.

аортавосходящий отдел аортыкоарктация аортыкровотокМРТМРТ-ангиографияскорость кровотокафазово-контрастная МРТ4D FLOWaortaaortic coarctationascending aortablood flowblood flow velocityMRIMRI angiographyphase-contrast MRI4D FLOWReferencesMarkl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, et al. 4D flow MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012 Nov;36(5):1015–36.Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, et al. 4D flow MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012 Nov;36(5):1015–36.Soulat G, McCarthy P, Markl M. 4D flow with MRI. Annual review of biomedical engineering. 2020 Jun 4;22:103–26.Soulat G, McCarthy P, Markl M. 4D flow with MRI. Annual review of biomedical engineering. 2020 Jun 4;22:103–26.Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le Ven F, et al. The role of imaging of flow patterns by 4D flow MRI in aortic stenosis. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019;35(3):417–427.Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le Ven F, et al. The role of imaging of flow patterns by 4D flow MRI in aortic stenosis. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019;35(3):417–427.Soulat G, McCarthy P, Markl M. 4D flow with MRI. Annual review of biomedical engineering. 2020 Jun 4;22:103–26.Soulat G, McCarthy P, Markl M. 4D flow with MRI. Annual review of biomedical engineering. 2020 Jun 4;22:103–26.Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Niespodzany E, et al. Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation. Investigative Radiology. 2013;48(12):819–825.Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Niespodzany E, et al. Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation. Investigative Radiology. 2013;48(12):819–825.Burris NS, Hope MD. 4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics. 2015 Feb 1;23(1):15–23.Burris NS, Hope MD. 4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics. 2015 Feb 1;23(1):15–23.Gabbour M, Gatehouse P, Schnell S, et al. Valverelated complications following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic flow patterns using 4D flow MRI. European Radiology. 2016;26(5):1231– 1239.Gabbour M, Gatehouse P, Schnell S, et al. Valverelated complications following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic flow patterns using 4D flow MRI. European Radiology. 2016;26(5):1231– 1239.Binter C, Knobloch V, Manka R, et al. Segmental aortic wall shear stress in healthy volunteers and patients after aortic valve-sparing surgery: Quantification by 4D flow-sensitive CMR. European Radiology. 2013;23(1):225–234.Binter C, Knobloch V, Manka R, et al. Segmental aortic wall shear stress in healthy volunteers and patients after aortic valve-sparing surgery: Quantification by 4D flow-sensitive CMR. European Radiology. 2013;23(1):225–234.Delles M, Rengier F, Azad Y, et al. Influence of temporal resolution and k-t BLAST acceleration on MR imaging-based noninvasive coronary artery flow profiling using 4D flow MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011;34(1):384–395.Delles M, Rengier F, Azad Y, et al. Influence of temporal resolution and k-t BLAST acceleration on MR imaging-based noninvasive coronary artery flow profiling using 4D flow MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011;34(1):384–395.Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Stalder A, et al. Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 tesla: A feasibility study in portal hypertension. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010;32(3):545–555.Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Stalder A, et al. Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 tesla: A feasibility study in portal hypertension. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010;32(3):545–555.Garg P, Westenberg J, van den Boogaard P, et al. Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in wholeheart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;50(4):1216–1226.Garg P, Westenberg J, van den Boogaard P, et al. Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in wholeheart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;50(4):1216–1226.Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, et al. Assessment of ascending aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients with 4D flow MRI: A feasibility study compared with echocardiography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2018;47(1):635–643.Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, et al. Assessment of ascending aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients with 4D flow MRI: A feasibility study compared with echocardiography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2018;47(1):635–643.Gu T, Korosec F, Block W, et al. PC VIPR: A highspeed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2005;26(4):743–749.Gu T, Korosec F, Block W, et al. PC VIPR: A highspeed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2005;26(4):743–749.Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder A, et al. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: Effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;63(2):330–338.Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder A, et al. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: Effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;63(2):330–338.Meckel S, Leitner L, Bonati L, et al. Intracranial artery velocity measurement using 4D PC MRI at 3 T: Comparison with transcranial ultrasound techniques and 2D PC MRI. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(6):607–613.Meckel S, Leitner L, Bonati L, et al. Intracranial artery velocity measurement using 4D PC MRI at 3 T: Comparison with transcranial ultrasound techniques and 2D PC MRI. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(6):607–613.Entezari P, Schnell S, Mahadevia R, et al. From unicuspid to quadricuspid: Influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2014;40(1):134– 141.Entezari P, Schnell S, Mahadevia R, et al. From unicuspid to quadricuspid: Influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2014;40(1):134– 141.Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T, et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3(6):647–655.Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T, et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3(6):647–655.Dyverfeldt P, Hope M, Tseng E, et al. Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;48(2):342–352.Dyverfeldt P, Hope M, Tseng E, et al. Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;48(2):342–352.Малахова М.В., Прохорова Е.А., Куличкин А.С. и др. Диагностика отрыва клапаносодержащего кондуита восходящего отдела аорты и его успешное хирургическое лечение. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2021;102(6):383–9.Малахова М.В., Прохорова Е.А., Куличкин А.С. и др. Диагностика отрыва клапаносодержащего кондуита восходящего отдела аорты и его успешное хирургическое лечение. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2021;102(6):383–9.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.