Enteral feeding abilities of neonates with congenital heart diseases underwent cardiac surgery — analysis of opportunities
https://doi.org/10.18705/27823806-2023-3-2-7-22
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
Objective: to analyze the factors affecting enteral feeding ability of neonates with congenital heart defects (CHD) who underwent cardiac surgery.
Patients and methods. The study included 214 full-term newborns with CHD who underwent cardiac surgery: 63 children with palliative correction of CHD and 151 children with radical correction of CHD. The characteristics of the early postoperative period, the timing of bottle feeding with additional gavage feeding, the achievement of the full volume of bottle feeding, the incidence of breastfeeding after surgery, and the duration of hospitalization were analyzed.
Results. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and inotropic therapy after cardiac surgery. Positive correlations (r > 0.6) were revealed between the duration of mechanical ventilation, inotropic therapy, of stay in the intensive care unit and the timing of the bottle feeding ability (including without additional gavage feeding). Newborns with palliative correction were able to feed from bottle significantly later than children with radical correction: there was a higher frequency of supplementary gavage feeding by the time of discharge (15.7 % vs. 1.8 %, p = 0.0016), a longer length of stay in hospital. Children who underwent the Norwood procedure were able to bottle feeding significantly later than newborns after other types of surgery.
Conclusion. Newborns with CHD require a personalized approach to enteral feeding, depending on the types of cardiac surgery undergone. Factors influencing the feeding of newborns were the use of CPB, the duration of mechanical ventilation and inotropic therapy after surgery.
About the Authors
A. V. KaplinaRussian Federation
Kaplina Aleksandra V., Junior Researcher, Research Laboratory of Physiology and Diseases of Newborns, Neonatologist of Department of Neonatal Physiology with an ICU Ward, Perinatal Centre.
Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341
O. N. Chugreeva
Russian Federation
Chugreeva Olga N. - PhD, Neonatologist of Department of Neonatal Physiology with an ICU Ward, Perinatal Centre.
Saint Petersburg
Yu. B. Zaretskaya
Russian Federation
Zaretskaya Yulia B., Neonatologist of Neonatal and Preterm Special Care Unit (2nd Stage Care), Perinatal Centre.
Saint Petersburg
N. A. Treskina
Russian Federation
Treskina Natalia A., Neonatologist of Neonatal and Preterm Special Care Unit (2nd Stage Care), Perinatal Centre.
Saint Petersburg
T. M. Pervunina
Russian Federation
Pervunina Tatiana M. - PhD, DSc, The Head of the Institute of Perinatology and Pediatrics, Leading Researcher of Research Department of Unknown, Rare and Genetically Determined Diseases, World-Class Research Centre for Personalized Medicine.
Saint Petersburg
N. A. Petrova
Russian Federation
Petrova Natalia A., PhD, The Head of Research Laboratory of Physiology and Diseases of Newborns, Researcher of Research Department of Unknown, Rare and Genetically Determined Diseases, World-Class Research Centre for Personalized Medicine.
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Norman V, Zühlke L, Murray K, Morrow B. Prevalence of feeding and swallowing disorders in congenital heart disease: a scoping review. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2022;10:843023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.843023.
2. Pados BF. Symptoms of problematic feeding in children with CHD compared to healthy peers. Cardiology in the Young. 2019;29(2):152-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951118001981.
3. Jones CE, Desai H, Fogel JL, et al. Disruptions in the development of feeding for infants with congenital heart disease. Cardiology in the Young. 2021;31(4):589- 596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951120004382.
4. Petrova NA, Kaplina AV, Kurzina EA, et al. Comparative analysis of enteral feeding practices for prevention of gastrointestinal complications in infants with ductus-dependent congenital heart diseases. Vopr Pitan. 2020;89(5):44-58. In Russian https://doi.org/10.24411/0042-8833-2020-10065.
5. Kwa L, Willette S, Schroeder JW. Evaluating dysphagia in infants with congenital heart disease using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2022;152:111004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.111004.
6. Lacour-Gayet F, Clarke D, Jacobs J, et al. Aristotle Committee. The Aristotle score for congenital heart surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2004;7:185-91. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2004.02.011.
7. Piggott KD, Babb J, Yong S, et al. Risk factors for gastrostomy tube placement in single ventricle patients following the Norwood procedure. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2018;30(4):443-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.02.012.
8. Indramohan G, Pedigo TP, Rostoker N, et al. Identification of risk factors for poor feeding in infants with congenital heart disease and a novel approach to improve oral feeding. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017;35:149-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.01.009.
9. Pereira K da R, Firpo C, Gasparin M, et al. Evaluation of Swallowing in Infants with Congenital Heart Defect. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;19(1):55- 60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384687.
10. Fujinaga CI, de Moraes SA, ZamberlanAmorim NE, et al. Clinical validation of the preterm oral feeding readiness assessment scale. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013;21 Spec No:140-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692013000700018. Erratum in: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014;22(5):883.
11. Malkar MB, Jadcherla S. Neuromotor mechanisms of pharyngoesophageal motility in dysphagic infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Res. 2014;76(2):190-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.68.
12. Jadcherla S, Vijayapal A, Leuthner S. Feeding abilities in neonates with congenital heart disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2009;29(2):112-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.136.
13. Furlong-Dillard J, Neary A, Marietta J, et al. Evaluating the impact of a feeding protocol in neonates before and after biventricular cardiac surgery. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018;3(3):e080. https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000080.
14. Scahill CJ, Graham EM, Atz AM, et al. Preoperative feeding neonates with cardiac disease: is the necrotizing enterocolitis fear justified? World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2017;8(1):62-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135116668833.
15. Averin K, Uzark K, Beekman RH, et al. Postoperative assessment of laryngopharyngeal dysfunction in neonates after Norwood operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1257-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.009.
16. Karpinski BA, Maynard TM, Fralish MS, Nuwayhid S, Zohn IE, Moody SA, et al. Dysphagia and disrupted cranial nerve development in a mouse model of DiGeorge (22q11) deletion syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2014 Feb;7(2):245-57. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.012484.
Review
For citations:
Kaplina A.V., Chugreeva O.N., Zaretskaya Yu.B., Treskina N.A., Pervunina T.M., Petrova N.A. Enteral feeding abilities of neonates with congenital heart diseases underwent cardiac surgery — analysis of opportunities. Russian Journal for Personalized Medicine. 2023;3(2):7-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/27823806-2023-3-2-7-22
ISSN 2782-3814 (Online)