4D FLOW in assessing blood flow in aorta.
https://doi.org/10.18705/2782-3806-2024-4-1-19-24
EDN: ZJJHSS
Abstract
The article is dedicated to reviewing the role of the 4D FLOW technique in assessing blood flow in the aorta. A brief historical and terminological overview is provided, along with a description of the current state of the issue. The clinical relevance and appropriateness of using this radiological diagnostic method are discussed. The scanning and image post-processing process is summarized. Finally, the prospects and significance of the reviewed technique in healthcare are outlined.
About the Authors
S. R. Sheriev
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sheriev Sultan R., resident of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and medical imaging with the clinic Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341
I. A. Turchinskaya
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Turchinskaya Irina A., resident of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and medical imaging with the clinic Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341
V. A. Fokin
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fokin Vladimir A., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Radiation diagnostics and medical imaging with the clinic Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341
A. V. Ryzhkov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryzhkov Anton V., Head of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Department, radiologist of the highest category, Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Akkuratova str., 2, Saint Petersburg, 197341
References
1. Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, et al. 4D flow MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012 Nov;36(5):1015–36.
2. Soulat G, McCarthy P, Markl M. 4D flow with MRI. Annual review of biomedical engineering. 2020 Jun 4;22:103–26.
3. Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le Ven F, et al. The role of imaging of flow patterns by 4D flow MRI in aortic stenosis. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019;35(3):417–427.
4. Soulat G, McCarthy P, Markl M. 4D flow with MRI. Annual review of biomedical engineering. 2020 Jun 4;22:103–26.
5. Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Niespodzany E, et al. Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation. Investigative Radiology. 2013;48(12):819–825.
6. Burris NS, Hope MD. 4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics. 2015 Feb 1;23(1):15–23.
7. Gabbour M, Gatehouse P, Schnell S, et al. Valverelated complications following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic flow patterns using 4D flow MRI. European Radiology. 2016;26(5):1231– 1239.
8. Binter C, Knobloch V, Manka R, et al. Segmental aortic wall shear stress in healthy volunteers and patients after aortic valve-sparing surgery: Quantification by 4D flow-sensitive CMR. European Radiology. 2013;23(1):225–234.
9. Delles M, Rengier F, Azad Y, et al. Influence of temporal resolution and k-t BLAST acceleration on MR imaging-based noninvasive coronary artery flow profiling using 4D flow MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011;34(1):384–395.
10. Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Stalder A, et al. Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 tesla: A feasibility study in portal hypertension. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010;32(3):545–555.
11. Garg P, Westenberg J, van den Boogaard P, et al. Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in wholeheart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;50(4):1216–1226.
12. Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, et al. Assessment of ascending aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients with 4D flow MRI: A feasibility study compared with echocardiography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2018;47(1):635–643.
13. Gu T, Korosec F, Block W, et al. PC VIPR: A highspeed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2005;26(4):743–749.
14. Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder A, et al. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: Effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;63(2):330–338.
15. Meckel S, Leitner L, Bonati L, et al. Intracranial artery velocity measurement using 4D PC MRI at 3 T: Comparison with transcranial ultrasound techniques and 2D PC MRI. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(6):607–613.
16. Entezari P, Schnell S, Mahadevia R, et al. From unicuspid to quadricuspid: Influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2014;40(1):134– 141.
17. Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T, et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3(6):647–655.
18. Dyverfeldt P, Hope M, Tseng E, et al. Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;48(2):342–352.
19. Малахова М.В., Прохорова Е.А., Куличкин А.С. и др. Диагностика отрыва клапаносодержащего кондуита восходящего отдела аорты и его успешное хирургическое лечение. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2021;102(6):383–9.
Review
For citations:
Sheriev S.R., Turchinskaya I.A., Fokin V.A., Ryzhkov A.V. 4D FLOW in assessing blood flow in aorta. Russian Journal for Personalized Medicine. 2024;4(1):19-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2782-3806-2024-4-1-19-24. EDN: ZJJHSS
Views:
135
Email this article 