Modern methods of radiation imaging of the pathology of the temporomandibular joint

   Modern methods of radiation imaging play an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathologies. This article examines the main imaging tech­niques, including radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (ultrasound) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Radiography, including panoramic and transcranial images, remains the main method of primary assessment of TMJ bone structures, due to its accessibility and low cost. Computed tomography with subsequent reconstruction provides detailed three­dimensional images of bones, which is es­pecially useful when planning surgical interventions, but have a high radiation dose. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the “gold standard” for imaging TMJ soft tissues, such as the articular disc and ligaments, without the use of ionizing radiation. Ultrasound, being an affordable and non­invasive method, allows you to evaluate soft tissues in real time, but its diagnostic value depends on the experience of the operator. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Combines the advantages of CT and radiography, providing high­resolution images with low radiation dose, making it ideal for evaluating bone structures. Current research is also aimed at integrating hybrid imaging techniques such as PET­CT and PET­MRI, and using artificial intelligence to automatically interpret images. The correct choice of imaging method depends on the specific clinical situation and the objectives of the study. Modern radiation imaging technologies significantly improve the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment of TMJ pathologies, providing better medical care to patients.

1. Alexandersson E, et al. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders : A systematic review. Dental and Medical Problems. 2019;56(1): 95–105.

2. Kapila S, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of the temporomandibular joint. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017; 152(6): 815–829.

3. Larheim TA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: An update on techniques and applications. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2015;42(10): 746–764.

4. Bianchi S, et al. Ultrasound imaging for temporomandibular joint disc dislocation : A review. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2018; 44(8): 1661–1676.

5. Poveda-Roda R, et al. Comparison of CBCT and MSCT in the assessment of temporomandibular joint disorders. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020;12(5): e499–e507.

6. Zhang X, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in dental and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Radiology. 2021;37(1): 37–44.

7. Benn DK. Radiographic techniques for the assessment of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular Practice. 2019;37(4): 242–252.

8. Васильев А.В. Лечение переломов ветви нижней челюсти : автореф. дисс. ...д-ра мед. наук / А. В. Васильев. СПб, 2001. 33 с.

9. Васильев А.Ю. Анализ данных лучевых методов исследования на основе принципов доказательной медицины : учеб. пособие / А. Ю. Васильев, А. Ю. Малый, Н. С. Серова. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2008. 32 с.

10. Васильев А.Ю. Лучевая диагностика в стоматологии. / А. Ю. Васильев, Ю. И. Воробьев, В. П. Трутень. М.: Медика, 2007. 496 с.

11. Лежнев Д.А. Лучевая диагностика травматических повреждений челюстно-лицевой области : автореф. дисс. ... д-ра мед. наук / Д. А. Лежнев. М., 2008. 43 с.

12. Лучевая диагностика в стоматологии : национальное руководство / гл. ред. тома А. Ю. Васильев. М.: ГЭОТАР- Медиа, 2010. 288 с.

13. Матос-Таранец И.Н. Клиническая классификация переломов мыщелкового отростка нижней челюсти / И. Н. Матос-Таранец, Д. К. Калиновский, А. В. Маргвелашвили // Травма. Донецк. 2008. Т. 9, № 1. С. 111–113.

14. Рабухина Н.А. Рентгенодиагностика в стоматологии / Н. А. Рабухина, А. П. Аржанцев. М.: МиА, 1999. 452 с.

15. Рабухина Н.А. Спиральная компьютерная томография при заболеваниях челюстно-лицевой области / Н. А. Рабухина, Г. И. Голубева, С. А. Перфильев. М.: МЕДпрессинформ, 2006. 126 с.

16. Сысолятин П.Г. Актуальные вопросы диагностики и лечения повреждений височно-нижнечелюстного сустава / П. Г. Сысолятин, И. А. Арсенова // Стоматология. 1999. № 2. С. 34–39.

17. Сысолятин П.Г. Классификация заболеваний и повреждений височно-нижнечелюстного сустава / П. Г. Сысолятин, А. Л. Ильин, А. П. Дергилев. М.: Медицинская книга, 2001. 79 с.

18. Дергилев А.П. Артротомография, компьютерная артротомография и магнитно-резонансная томография височно-нижнечелюстного сустава : дисс. ... д-ра мед. наук / А. П. Дергилев. М., 2001. 249 с.

19. Chiba M, Kumagai M, Funkin N, et al. The relationship of bone marrow edema patern in the mandibular condyle with joint pain in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders: longitudinal study with MR imaging // Int. J. Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2006. Vol. 35. Р. 55–59.

20. Martini MZ. Epidemiology of mandibular fractures treated in a Brazilian level I trauma public hospital in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil / M. Z. Martini, et al. // Braz. Dent. J. 2006. No 3. P. 243–248.

21. Napolitano G. Multidetector row computed tomography with multiplanar and 3D images in the evaluation of posttreatment mandibular fractures / G. Napolitano, et al. // Semin Ultrasound CTMR. 2009. No 3. P. 181–187.

22. Petersson A. What you can and cannot see in TMJ imaging — an overview related to the RDC/TMD diagnostic system // J. Oral Rehabilitation. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.unboundmedicine.com. (May 18, 2010).

23. Romeo A. Role of multidetector row computed tomography in the management of mandible traumatic lesions / A. Romeo, et al. // Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2009. No 3. P. 174–180.

24. Saponaro A. Magnetic resonance imaging in the postsurgical evaluation of patients with mandibular condyle fractures treated using the transparotid approach: our experience / A. Saponaro, et al. // J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009. No 8. P. 1672–1679.